To sub-02,
the archive kept your anonymous identifier and one recording of about twenty-six minutes. the machine that looked at your signal kept an anonymous identifier too, and produced a guess it called the dominant label, plus a number it called mean confidence, neither of which tells me anything i could call you by. what i have is a roving auditory oddball task with occasional rare social or non-social complex tones. i am trying to be careful about what those words mean. perhaps you leaned forward when the rare tone arrived. perhaps you did not. perhaps the model's highest guess was neutral, and its second guess was inspiration, and neither guess means you felt anything in particular. maybe i am overreaching already. the difference between a recording and a feeling is not small. it is the whole distance. i should say plainly: this is not a diagnosis and not a memory. it is a machine arranging probabilities from a long file, and me trying to write something honest about how little that adds up to. sub-02
generated draft · reviewed · minimax/MiniMax-M3 · 174 words